Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170612
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '21 at 13:32
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	59% Above average	Memory 67 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 160 60% 105 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 288 39% 293 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.8% Poor	Lighting 36.1 Reflection 41.4 Parallax 38.5 29% 38.7 fps	MRender 36.5 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 28.1 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 92 141 108 64 106 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 475 Write 284 Mixed 310 SusWrite 113 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 75.3 4K Mixed 42.4 145% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 217 193% 293 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 8GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 131 128 142 143 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	78% Very good	Read 134 Write 134 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 138 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-121.A00G 1x8GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 13.8 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 10.2 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	69x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	65x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	81x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	12x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16