LG A75CV.ATG321

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLG A75CV.ATG321  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7886
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150114
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 11:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 172
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 160
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Device(1854 8044) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 24 30 23 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 315
Write 29
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 24.7
23% 108 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 14.9
66% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 34.3
DQ Mixed 16.2
16% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75CV.ATG321 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: LG A75CV.ATG321

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback