To Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 10:30
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 149
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 598
49% 427 Pts
64-Core 1,164
72% 1,164 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Gigabyte(1458 354D) 2GB
CLim: 1352 MHz, MLim: 1675 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 59.6
38% 49.4 fps
MRender 56.9
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 45.6
43% 53.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 50 14 54 15 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.7% Poor
Read 244
Write 45.5
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 54.4
21% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 10.2
42% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 18.4
DQ Mixed 16.8
13% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 102%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$171
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 166 166 160 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 147
Mixed 104
SusWrite 163
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
220% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
31.8% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback