Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory3.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 08:51
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 58
2-Core 134
49% 84.6 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 295
29% 236 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 14.6
9% 29 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 11.6
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 732 841 731 496 439 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 578
Write 590
Mixed 697
SusWrite 608
140% 619 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 35.2
107% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 565
396% 487 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 114%
Great: 181%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
295GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 80 79 79 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 88.5
Write 80.7
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 79.8
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
138% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN Kingston 12GB
3200, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 15.1
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback