Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive355% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 01:06
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 253
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 656
68% 549 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Dell(1028 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.2% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 74.5
Parallax 68.1
58% 71.2 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 67.1
56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1946 1925 1965 2028 2053 2084 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 2,673
Write 2,170
Mixed 1,457
SusWrite 2,000
465% 2,075 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 79.6
271% 96.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,052
DQ Write 817
DQ Mixed 893
679% 921 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 355%
Great: 393%
Amd-raid Array 5 499GB
447GB free
Firmware: 9.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 499 502 500 504 503 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 490
Mixed 421
SusWrite 501
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 47.8
159% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 187
159% 225 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 107%
Great: 354%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00S 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 183 186 184 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 183
Write 172
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 182
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 0.4
18% 6.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 0.2
2% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 33%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00S 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 161 161 160 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 152
Write 159
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 161
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 0.5
21% 6.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 0.6
2% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 33%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
612GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 104 105 103 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 104
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 31.6
100% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 29.5
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback