Lenovo INVALID

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo INVALID  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170307
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 19:37
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 148
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 215
28% 214 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 382B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 6
Parallax 6.8
5% 6.3 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 9.8
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 81 84 82 80 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 410
Write 366
Mixed 326
SusWrite 118
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 49.5
163% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 335
252% 338 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
103GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 56 56 55 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 55.7
Write 63.4
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 56.4
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 0467 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.7% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical INVALID Builds (Compare 2,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo INVALID

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback