Shuttle DL20N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemShuttle DL20N  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle DL20N
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211022
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 09:22
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6005
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 161
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 335
41% 315 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1297 4095) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1121
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.7 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 1
Splatting 8.7
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS250G 250GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK9NO2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 988 804 995 892 741 786 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 749
Write 833
Mixed 795
SusWrite 868
184% 811 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 42.8
132% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 549
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 629
476% 632 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 153%
Great: 211%
Kingston DT Ultimate G2 32GB
21GB free, PID 1656
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 77 77 69 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 99.9
Write 54.3
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 73.2
86% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
83% 2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2933C17S4/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DL20N Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Shuttle DL20N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback