Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_F512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive410% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_F512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DAP
Memory5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 06:03
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 151
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 265
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1072) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 7.4
4% 6.1 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 8.6
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$92
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 666 750 578 678 680 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
410% Outstanding
Read 4,226
Write 3,433
Mixed 3,846
SusWrite 636
678% 3,035 MB/s
4K Read 196
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 169
595% 173 MB/s
DQ Read 572
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 312
254% 371 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 410%
Great: 463%
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
242GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 304 310 317 316 313 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 472
Write 315
Mixed 366
SusWrite 312
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 29
96% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 85.9
DQ Write 76
DQ Mixed 91.2
66% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 119%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 105
Mixed 68.2
72% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 70%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
7GB free, PID 009f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 5.4 4.8 6 4.8 5.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 2.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 5.1
9% 8.47 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 12GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
65.9% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 17.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 18.8
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_F512DA Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DAP_F512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback