Lenovo 42763LU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 42763LU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 42763LU
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180614
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 05:05
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2860QM-$469
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 87
2-Core 174
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 434
48% 376 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.1269
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 2
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2010XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 301 349 146 127 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 299
Write 380
Mixed 319
SusWrite 236
70% 309 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 24.4
86% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 89.4
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 117
104% 151 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.9% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 7.6
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 42763LU Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 42763LU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $469
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $492Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback