Lenovo 20FH001QCA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20FH001QCA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FH001QCA
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 21:20
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 95%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 140
58% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 214
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2231) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.47 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 164 194 203 205 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.7% Good
Read 151
Write 92.9
Mixed 275
SusWrite 190
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 34
114% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 205
176% 255 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 16
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FH001QCA Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FH001QCA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $34
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback