Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Siemens SIMATIC IPC627D PROFIBUS (all builds)
Motherboard	SIEMENS A5E34736482
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '21 at 19:54
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1268L v3 39 User benchmarks, average bench 66% FCLGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 180 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 406 42% 340 Pts	64-Core 412 26% 412 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400 5,817 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	9.27% Terrible	Lighting 11.5 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 9.5 9% 11.3 fps	MRender 10.4 Gravity 10 Splatting 12.3 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 9.27% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 295GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 446 368 396 325 312 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 451 Mixed 398 SusWrite 384 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 52.8 175% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 358 269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 1x8GB 609 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 8.9 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1268L v3IntelBench 66%, 39 samples	3x

GPU
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples	2x
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x

RAM
16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 609 samples	2x
16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 2x8GBMicronBench 56%, 1,022 samples	1x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94