TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel DP67BA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemINTEL_ DP67BA__
MotherboardIntel DP67BA  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 18:18
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 74.5
45% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 119
15% 115 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 47.4%
 Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 59 114 80 92 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 170
Write 176
Mixed 200
SusWrite 98.2
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 16.2
61% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 49.8
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 7.2
37% 78.7 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 36.6%
 Great: 95%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
207GB free
Firmware: JA2OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 66 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 54.3
Write 54.3
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 68
36% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 35.2%
 Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 8.2 8.4 8.4 8.1 8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
7.64% Terrible
Read 32.5
Write 12
Mixed 9
SusWrite 8
17% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 7.64%
 Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.5% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 10.5
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 44.5%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical DP67BA Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DP67BA

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel  $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples2x
Core i5-2500KIntel  $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples2x
Core i5-2320Intel  $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples2x
GPU
GTX 560Nvidia  $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples2x
HD 6970AMDBench 20%, 9,594 samples1x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples1x
SSD
SSDSA2CW12 120GBIntelBench 39%, 78 samples1x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples1x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung  $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples1x
RAM
JM1333KLN-4G 2x4GBTranscendBench 47%, 2,539 samples1x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples1x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback