Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 04:32
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 246
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 758
72% 594 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$1,438
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.09
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 108% Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T3XHC-00SJG0 1TB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1949 1511 1498 1512 1514 1512 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,002
Write 2,355
Mixed 1827
SusWrite 1,583
438% 1,942 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 84.2
313% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,196
DQ Write 985
DQ Mixed 1,038
792% 1,073 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 321%
Great: 334%
MB010000GWAYN 10TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 226 229 236 234 224 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 220
Write 235
Mixed 103
SusWrite 228
144% 197 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 1.2
299% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Seagate ST12000NE0007-2GT116 12TB
2TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 157 155 155 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 109%
Seagate ST14000DM001-2JC101 14TB
4TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 222 224 224 225 226 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
112GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 192 193 193 194 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 89.5
Mixed 76
SusWrite 192
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96%
Great: 114%
HGST Ultrastar He8 Helium 8TB-$96
1.5TB free
Firmware: A4GNT7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 117 120 123 122 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 121
Write 134
Mixed 66
SusWrite 120
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.3
148% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 113%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 196 188 197 197 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 197
Write 160
Mixed 91
SusWrite 194
211% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%
GB0750C4 414 750GB
54GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 66 66 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.1% Poor
Read 62.5
Write 56.8
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 65.4
76% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
57% 0.73 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 76.4
MC Mixed 40.4
145% 50.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 10.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 126%
Great: 170%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback