Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory118.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 19:47
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 80.2
1-Core 153
2-Core 297
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 1,150
102% 862 Pts
64-Core 2,049
127% 2,049 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 102
Reflection 114
Parallax 103
83% 106 fps
Gravity 103
Splatting 101
90% 102 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1286 1318 1316 1320 1309 1319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1476
Write 1,204
Mixed 1,134
SusWrite 1,311
288% 1,281 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 79.2
262% 90.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,100
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 916
708% 971 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 265%
Great: 435%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$371
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 483 482 482 478 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 476
Mixed 456
SusWrite 480
108% 479 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 98.4
4K Mixed 58.5
193% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 126%
Great: 137%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2317 2329 2326 2327 2315 2324 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
375% Outstanding
Read 2,429
Write 2,304
Mixed 2,225
SusWrite 2323
523% 2,320 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 84
270% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,256
DQ Write 1,046
DQ Mixed 1,010
795% 1104 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 375%
Great: 526%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2331 2327 2324 1863 1494 1533 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 2,545
Write 2,229
Mixed 1,896
SusWrite 1,979
486% 2,162 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 82.6
275% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,115
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 996
772% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 356%
Great: 435%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 243 230 241 233 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 246
Write 250
Mixed 101
SusWrite 235
152% 208 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 1.7
381% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 138%
Great: 136%
Asmedia ASM1153E 2TB
36GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 23.9
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 71.1
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW128GX4M4D3000C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $2,334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback