Lenovo 10AHS1R700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10AHS1R700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140811
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 18:06
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4430-$124
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 333
43% 325 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 309F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4326
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.2
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 32 57 28 59 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 436
Write 350
Mixed 274
SusWrite 68.7
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 9.2
41% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34%
Great: 56%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
714GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 109 108 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 128
Write 104
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 110
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
198% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030KD68F9F1600 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AHS1R700 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AHS1R700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback