Packard imedia S1800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemPackard imedia S1800  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard Veriton M275
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 17:28
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 41.9
2-Core 82.9
42% 64.8 Pts
4-Core 84.9
8-Core 83.1
11% 84 Pts
64-Core 85.8
5% 85.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315
Sapphire(174B 1141) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.3 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 110 112 99 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 103
Write 115
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 104
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CHO-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S1800 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S1800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $96
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback