Biostar H61MHV2

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	67.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar H61MHV2 (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '21 at 14:30
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	87%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 73.6 2-Core 127 58% 94 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 236 24% 194 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.3% Good	Lighting 83.6 Reflection 80.3 Parallax 77.3 68% 80.4 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 75.7 Splatting 68.5 66% 82.2 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$113 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 137 79 78 75 79 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.9% Average	Read 195 Write 185 Mixed 186 SusWrite 104 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 27.2 90% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 34.6 DQ Write 78.3 DQ Mixed 47 38% 53.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 128%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 937GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 155 156 156 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 169 Mixed 42.5 SusWrite 156 99% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
INNO8GB1600S 2x8GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	40.4% Average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61MHV2 Builds (Compare 128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MHV2

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $184Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	17x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	14x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	12x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,698 samples	4x

RAM
2x8GBINNO8GB1600SBench 51%, 66 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	5x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $212

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16