Acer Swift SF314-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Swift SF314-52  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Suntory_KL
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 12:31
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4415U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 135
56% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 197
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Acer(1025 118C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5038
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 3.4
2% 3.3 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 95 82 67 69 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 441
Write 372
Mixed 316
SusWrite 88.1
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 26.8
109% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 185
174% 270 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF25664HZ-2G3B1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 19.9
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF314-52 Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback