Today's hottest deals

Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus WS C422 PRO_SE  (all builds)
Memory119.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 11:20
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2125
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 73.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 251
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 736
72% 589 Pts
64-Core 732
45% 732 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
205% Outstanding
Lighting 301
Reflection 286
Parallax 346
245% 311 fps
MRender 345
Gravity 245
Splatting 183
202% 258 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 205%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1727 1633 1575 1550 1514 1522 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,009
Write 1,748
Mixed 1534
SusWrite 1,587
386% 1,720 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 89.7
295% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,186
DQ Write 534
DQ Mixed 443
439% 721 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 308%
Great: 410%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2056 2093 2127 2095 2030 2105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 1,846
Write 2,088
Mixed 1,532
SusWrite 2,084
426% 1,888 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 68
222% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,137
DQ Write 920
DQ Mixed 1011
762% 1,023 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 316%
Great: 702%
Team T253X6002T 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 7A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 438 41 9 9 9.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 484
Write 421
Mixed 385
SusWrite 159
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 33.1
151% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 56
110% 218 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G3D1 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 54.4
MC Mixed 27.8
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 10.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS C422 PRO_SE Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 152% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback