Lenovo 81UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics68% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81UF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 03:27
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 251
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 770
77% 627 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FEE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68% Good
Lighting 84.2
Reflection 92.8
Parallax 79.8
69% 85.6 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 73.7
67% 83 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GD9TNG-L3A0B 512GB
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80050C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 963 691 693 684 680 633 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,069
Write 1,079
Mixed 490
SusWrite 724
188% 840 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 34.2
122% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 273
270% 455 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 149%
Great: 203%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
391GB free
Firmware: LXM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 155 151 156 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 109
Write 54.8
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 151
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 22.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 25.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81UF Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 81UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback