Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JP_X409JP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JP_X409JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409JP
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '21 at 02:39
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 234
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 422
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1B9F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 7.9
6% 5.8 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 10
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1202 512GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 946 738 743 743 611 606 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,216
Write 1168
Mixed 1,182
SusWrite 731
242% 1,074 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 63.4
216% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 741
551% 732 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 193%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 21.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JP_X409JP Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409JP_X409JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback