Default AORUS 17G YD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGIGABYTE AORUS 17G YD
MotherboardDefault AORUS 17G YD  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210504
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 11 '21 at 20:47
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 161
2-Core 321
100% 188 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1,051
99% 822 Pts
64-Core 1,519
94% 1,519 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Gigabyte(1458 78CB) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6235
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 188
Parallax 169
134% 174 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 135
Splatting 114
111% 140 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 121%
Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESR512GMFCM-E8GBTNB4 512GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2304 892 354 376 426 362 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2311
Write 2,490
Mixed 1,965
SusWrite 786
424% 1,888 MB/s
4K Read 68.8
4K Write 269
4K Mixed 103
379% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 755
DQ Write 1,033
DQ Mixed 1,062
756% 950 MB/s
Poor: 166%
This bench: 297%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1P32NCSV1-BDBS 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 30.1
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 19
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AORUS 17G YD Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

Motherboard: Default AORUS 17G YD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback