Lenovo 20041

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20041  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Base Board Product Name
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '17 at 01:40
Run Duration390 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 640
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 83
2-Core 146
57% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 184
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3920) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.57
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$81
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 228
Write 155
Mixed 161
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 9.67
40% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 81.6
DQ Mixed 43.9
51% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
2GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.98% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 5.03
Mixed 8.67
12% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.51
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 1.31
80% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.98%
Great: 13%
SDHC Card 8GB
2GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.79% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 11.5
Mixed 14.4
19% 16 MB/s
4K Read 3.44
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.6
58% 1.59 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.79%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5428-046.A00LF M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.6
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20041 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20041

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback