MSI MS-ACB31

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-ACB311
MotherboardMSI MS-ACB31  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140328
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 11 '21 at 08:50
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 153
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 212
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
MSI(1462 ACB3) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 19.4
16% 18.8 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 21.4
Splatting 15.2
16% 20 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 28 26 43 32 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 82.9
Write 84.9
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 30.8
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 62%
A-DATA HDD CH94 250GB
23GB free, PID a94a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 34.4
Write 34.4
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 38.2
44% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-ACB31 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-ACB31

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback