Galax H310M PLUS+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGalax H310M PLUS+  (all builds)
MotherboardGALAX H310M PLUS+
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200219
Uptime9 Days
Run DateDec 11 '21 at 04:38
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 685
73% 581 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66% Good
Lighting 82.7
Reflection 80.9
Parallax 76.9
67% 80.2 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 65.1
63% 79.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 37 161 34 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 356
Write 111
Mixed 61
SusWrite 62.9
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 9.4
43% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 16.6
14% 19.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
67GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 98 108 115 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 155
Write 128
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 103
73% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PLUS+ Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Galax H310M PLUS+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback