Besstar UM340

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemBesstar UM340  (all builds)
MotherboardBESSTAR UM340
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 22:35
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 212
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 465
54% 417 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
9.55% Terrible
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 16
10% 13.1 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 11.4
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.55%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-A01 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1067 511 312 316 330 328 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1253
Write 1,159
Mixed 1,117
SusWrite 477
225% 1,002 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 63.3
207% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 503
DQ Mixed 678
501% 669 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 174%
Great: 215%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
228GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 241 240 241 240 241 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 454
Write 216
Mixed 164
SusWrite 241
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 22.9
107% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 51.1
87% 169 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S8K1C-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 27.3
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM340 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Besstar UM340

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback