Toshiba SATELLITE C850-140

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C850-140  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 20:36
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B820
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 85.8
46% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 87.4
8-Core 87.9
12% 87.7 Pts
64-Core 83.6
5% 83.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (PHDGD Omega 5.0)
Toshiba(1179 FB30) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 5.0.64.2016
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 128GB 128GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 123 122 124 124 119 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.6% Above average
Read 259
Write 157
Mixed 184
SusWrite 129
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 23.5
87% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 162
118% 153 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: GG2OA6C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 100 101 102 101 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 96.5
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 99.3
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C850-140 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C850-140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback