Acer Aspire V5-552G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V5-552G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Dazzle_RL
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 20:15
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5557M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40% Average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 44.1
2-Core 85.3
40% 63.1 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 115
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40%
Great: 51%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 75 80 86 105 154 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 412
Write 159
Mixed 206
SusWrite 93.9
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 10.3
70% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 29.7
68% 144 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Elpida FCJ41UG6BBU0-DJ-F 8GB
667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-552G Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-552G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback