Medion E3222 MD62450

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMedion E3222 MD62450  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION YS13G
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 09:58
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 43.5
1-Core 32.1
2-Core 73.6
30% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 150
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(1E39 A002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 350 343 328 367 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 408
Write 340
Mixed 327
SusWrite 340
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 36.1
117% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 174
136% 190 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 123%
SDXC Card 394GB
323GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 24 24 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 23.4
Write 23.6
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 23.9
31% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
74% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 11.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 0.9
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E3222 MD62450 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E3222 MD62450

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback