Asus ZenBook UX563FD_Q537FD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook UX563FD_Q537FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX563FD
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 03:17
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 285
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 637
72% 562 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 82%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 With Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 1B31) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6259
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 24.6
21% 27.7 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 19.4
22% 28 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL HBRPEKNX0203A 1TB
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 913 901 940 944 930 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,108
Write 914
Mixed 844
SusWrite 917
212% 946 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 63.4
230% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 631
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 477
364% 499 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 194%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT52L1G32D4PG-093 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 20.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 21.7
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook UX563FD_Q537FD Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Asus ZenBook UX563FD_Q537FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback