Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 198%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 23:07
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 171
2-Core 342
104% 197 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,318
118% 995 Pts
64-Core 2,818
174% 2,818 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.11.1
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 201
Reflection 240
Parallax 406
164% 282 fps
MRender 354
Gravity 154
Splatting 260
208% 256 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 163%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 612
Write 633
Mixed 288
114% 511 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 47.3
158% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 501
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 111
160% 304 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 144%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
715GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 121 117 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 134
Write 125
Mixed 75
SusWrite 120
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 83%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
287GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 19 14 20 25 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 14.6
Write 49.3
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 22.4
22% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
63% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 110%
ST1000DX 001-1CM162 1TB
187GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.6 0.7 3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 176
Write 111
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 1.2
108% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.7
245% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 72%
WDC WD50 00AZRX-00A3KB0 500GB
337GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 83 82 83 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
Read 103
Write 76.5
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 82.4
110% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 44%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00KUWA0 1TB
600GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 82 81 83 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 125
Write 118
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 82
133% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82% Excellent
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 26.3
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 24.7
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback