Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 18:51
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 170
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 435
46% 369 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Gigabyte(1458 3513) 1.2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 20.5
0% 20.3 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 22
Splatting 25.9
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 54 44 54 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 60.4
Write 39.9
Mixed 27
SusWrite 49
32% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 86%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
2TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 88 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 94.9
Write 94.3
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 88.7
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-156.A00LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback