Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '17 at 15:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 790
82% 662 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 204
Parallax 178
153% 190 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 182
Splatting 128
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 511
Write 486
Mixed 503
112% 500 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 11.6
106% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 13.2
58% 121 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
644GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 146
Mixed 158
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.22
86% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2666C15D4/8G KHX2666C15D4/4G 24GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 26.5
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback