Asus GL703VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL703VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL703VD
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 13:01
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 384
51% 384 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1BC0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9709
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 34.9
24% 34.3 fps
MRender 34.7
Gravity 33
Splatting 19.8
23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30200P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 110 136 135 137 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 387
Write 134
Mixed 153
SusWrite 130
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 20.6
113% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 128
124% 203 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 70%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
308GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 99 101 108 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 56.5
Write 97.1
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 102
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL703VD Builds (Compare 518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL703VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback