Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 125% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 125% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '21 at 06:45
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$175 128,080 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Memory 77.5 1-Core 138 2-Core 265 87% 160 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 882 84% 697 Pts	64-Core 1,317 82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 112%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 403F) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	145% Outstanding	Lighting 202 Reflection 162 Parallax 190 165% 185 fps	MRender 270 Gravity 151 Splatting 111 137% 178 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,456 Write 2,084 Mixed 1,552 451% 2,031 MB/s	4K Read 50.2 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 67.8 245% 91 MB/s	DQ Read 1,095 DQ Write 875 DQ Mixed 972 731% 981 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 954GB free Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1402 1398 1440 1396 1398 1401 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	263% Outstanding	Read 1,504 Write 1,490 Mixed 1,056 SusWrite 1,406 307% 1364 MB/s	4K Read 57.2 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 77.5 270% 97.7 MB/s	DQ Read 632 DQ Write 884 DQ Mixed 460 431% 659 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 263% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 46,140 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 28.3 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.9 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 29.5 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,655x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,269x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,418x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,240x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,078x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,471x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,837x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	772x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	726x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,027

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16