Lenovo 86148BU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 86148BU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 86148BU
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180601
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 02:12
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 78%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3427U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.6% Average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 79.2
48% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 90.1
8-Core 130
14% 110 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 500C) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.9 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.6
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Edge SE847 SSD 500GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0614D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 281 269 313 318 325 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 373
Write 322
Mixed 250
SusWrite 298
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 17.4
62% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 185
150% 211 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 86148BU Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 86148BU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback