Asus P5KPL-VM

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL-VM (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '21 at 19:15
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130 8,675 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Memory 51.8 1-Core 26.8 2-Core 51.3 29% 43.3 Pts	4-Core 54.7 8-Core 55.2 7% 55 Pts	64-Core 55.9 4% 55.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.39% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 3.8 3% 3.93 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.39% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 52 50 50 39 46 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.2% Below average	Read 196 Write 76.4 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 50.4 22% 102 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 33.6 4K Mixed 9.9 59% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 13.6 20% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 78%
TOSHIBA USB 2.5"-HDD 250GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 162GB free, PID 0b03 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 18 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 22.9 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 18.8 30% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 19%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB 996 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.2 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	4.76% Terrible	Read 15.9 Write 5.2 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 5.3 10% 8.27 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.76% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.1 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL-VM Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-VM

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	5x
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples	4x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	4x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	44x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	4x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16