Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 36.4 1-Core 55.6 2-Core 106 37% 66.1 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 215 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 216 13% 216 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.43% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.7 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 5.8 4% 4.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.43% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 387GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 346 358 345 350 358 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 397 Write 345 Mixed 303 SusWrite 348 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 34 118% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 236 196% 283 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.C8FE 2x4GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 12 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 220 18% 220 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	21x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	21x

RAM
M471A5143EB0-CPB 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,518 samples	2x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GBSK_HynixBench 27%, 94 samples	2x
CT4G4SFS824A.M8FE 2x4GBCrucialBench 72%, 85 samples	2x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $14

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16