Acer Aspire 4750

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 4750  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 4750
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 07:08
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 129
55% 90.7 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 178
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0507) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 104 106 108 104 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 423
Write 327
Mixed 326
SusWrite 147
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 28.3
98% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 217
182% 262 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 94%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
458GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 24 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 20.4
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 26.5
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 830B NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4750 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4750

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback