Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 23:51
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 154
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 296
32% 254 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 37 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Ts512gss D370S 512GB
452GB free
Firmware: O091
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 283 273 277 280 279 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 344
Write 321
Mixed 270
SusWrite 285
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 34
112% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 147
103% 134 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 43 35 28 41 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 88.9
Write 109
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 33.3
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM 2400 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 13.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,078 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback