Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150409
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 12:42
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 760K (2013 D.Ri)-$59
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 144
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 214
30% 220 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 19.4
18% 19.6 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 9.6
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSPAN102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 16 18 22 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 327
Write 14
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 22.4
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 27.7
69% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 34.5
52% 106 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905403-02X.A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.4
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-DS2 Builds (Compare 170 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-DS2 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $282
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback