Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za) 3,595 User benchmarks, average bench 25% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	21.4% Poor	Memory 38.1 1-Core 16.7 2-Core 24.9 19% 26.6 Pts	4-Core 30.2 8-Core 26.8 4% 28.5 Pts	64-Core 27.5 2% 27.5 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340 3,203 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 90AD) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.05% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 1.8 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.05% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xraydisk 256GB 256GB 1,063 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 66 10 132 8.5 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 340 Write 284 Mixed 285 SusWrite 97.8 56% 252 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 23.5 4K Mixed 13.5 50% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 88.2 DQ Write 80.8 DQ Mixed 37.5 41% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 156%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.9 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 25%, 3,595 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7340AMDBench 1%, 3,203 samples	2x

SSD
256GB 256GBXraydiskBench 60%, 13 samples	1x
256GB 256GBXraydiskBench 86%, 1,063 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x