Asus X75VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus X75VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X75VC
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 10:16
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 144
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 210
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M
Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5
Parallax 2
3% 3.63 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSC180DS37256GH 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 136 105 126 107 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 449
Write 307
Mixed 314
SusWrite 134
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 25.1
92% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 195
172% 257 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264HZ-1G6D 1 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X75VC Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X75VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback