Asus H81M-V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-V3  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 07:55
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3260
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 184
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 183
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000L1 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 413
Write 105
Mixed 189
51% 236 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 33
129% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 188
160% 241 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: CA12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 111
Write 61.5
Mixed 50.6
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX4GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMX4GX3M2A2000C9 6GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-V3 Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback