Alldocube i1405

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlldocube i1405  (all builds)
MotherboardALLDOCUBE ALLDOCUBE
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 02:23
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 149
50% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 259
37% 272 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
2.92% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 5.4
4% 6.3 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.5
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.92%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 62 68 18 123 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 395
Write 335
Mixed 323
SusWrite 73.3
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 11.2
43% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 0.5
34% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GB
2 of 2 slots used
12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.4% Above average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 25
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 14.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical i1405 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Alldocube i1405

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback