Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Zephyrus M GU502GU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GU502GU
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '21 at 19:09
Run Duration	972 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 129 2-Core 249 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 805 77% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,007 62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 101F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3150 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.4% Poor	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0 Parallax 85.8 0% 28.6 fps	MRender 95.5 Gravity 78.2 Splatting 71.8 66% 81.8 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59 34,063 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,242 Write 1,185 Mixed 1,007 255% 1,144 MB/s	4K Read 53.9 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 65.9 220% 73.5 MB/s	DQ Read 807 DQ Write 437 DQ Mixed 410 361% 551 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 271%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 185GB free Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 303 58 75 76 57 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	147% Outstanding	Read 1,282 Write 545 Mixed 809 SusWrite 178 155% 703 MB/s	4K Read 49.7 4K Write 97.4 4K Mixed 59.2 203% 68.8 MB/s	DQ Read 330 DQ Write 647 DQ Mixed 341 301% 439 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 209%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 14GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 4.9 12 12 11 11 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 68.6 Write 13.2 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 9.4 26% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 16GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	82.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 23.1 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 35.8 SC Mixed 24.8 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	17x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	9x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	8x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	13x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	1x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $73Bench 212%, 171,271 samples	1x

RAM
M471A2G43AB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 5,740 samples	12x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 029E CMSX8GX4M1A2666C18 16GBMicronBench 77%, 68 samples	1x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GBMicronBench 74%, 5,735 samples	1x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16