Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 17:49
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 38
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 115
35% 64 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 420
38% 321 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 14.9
11% 28.2 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 12.8
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 528 396 408 391 415 418 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,046
Write 976
Mixed 726
SusWrite 426
178% 794 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 33.5
121% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 401
306% 421 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 124%
Great: 187%
Ct1000bx 50 1TB
129GB free
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 281 373 87 15 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 457
Write 370
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 136
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 0.8
40% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 44.5
DQ Mixed 0.9
30% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 26.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 17.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback