Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory120.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 11:33
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$430
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 292
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1,086
98% 828 Pts
64-Core 2,037
126% 2,037 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 104
Reflection 114
Parallax 116
84% 111 fps
Gravity 103
Splatting 102
91% 103 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1311 1320 1323 1330 1329 1328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,496
Write 1,196
Mixed 1,140
SusWrite 1,324
290% 1,289 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 80.1
265% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,111
DQ Write 916
DQ Mixed 905
707% 978 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 268%
Great: 435%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$368
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 486 486 488 487 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 483
Mixed 449
SusWrite 486
108% 481 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 59.6
195% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 127%
Great: 137%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2335 2336 2345 2345 2339 2330 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
377% Outstanding
Read 2440
Write 2,319
Mixed 2,252
SusWrite 2,338
527% 2,337 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 84.1
274% 93.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,232
DQ Write 1,076
DQ Mixed 1,063
822% 1,124 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 377%
Great: 526%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
2TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2328 2342 2333 1905 1586 1601 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
359% Outstanding
Read 2,569
Write 2,350
Mixed 1,914
SusWrite 2016
497% 2,212 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 81.2
273% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 1,048
DQ Mixed 986
770% 1,061 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 359%
Great: 435%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 241 239 245 238 248 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB
1.5TB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 40.8
Write 36.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 39.8
49% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 20%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 494GB
94GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 8.9 23 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 22.5
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 19
32% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.4
123% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW128GX4M4D3000C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 21.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 23.3
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XII FORMULA - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $2,334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback