Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds)
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '21 at 23:55
Run Duration	170 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9350KF-$180 1,442 User benchmarks, average bench 89% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 83.2 1-Core 132 2-Core 267 88% 161 Pts	4-Core 534 8-Core 522 71% 528 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8767) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.4% Above average	Lighting 75.8 Reflection 76.7 Parallax 73.3 62% 75.3 fps	MRender 62.1 Gravity 71.9 Splatting 58.3 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128-11 SATA 128GB 5,529 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: C27110B SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 192 133 134 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	93% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 391 Mixed 377 SusWrite 149 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 86.9 4K Mixed 49.2 166% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 115 136% 234 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 96%
Sandisk PLUS 120GB 16,974 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 87GB free Firmware: UE4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 30 55 53 72 69 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 406 Write 234 Mixed 166 SusWrite 74 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 17.6 68% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 80.7 DQ Mixed 39.8 45% 78.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471A1K43CB1-CTD 89C2 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 22 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 22.6 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	547x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	227x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	118x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	134x
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	121x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	161x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	69x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	59x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	97x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	71x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16