Asrock Z97 Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '21 at 17:51
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 239
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 640
66% 531 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.4% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 109
Parallax 121
95% 116 fps
MRender 167
Gravity 117
Splatting 101
102% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 424 426 430 368 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 471
Mixed 392
SusWrite 396
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59.3
200% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
110GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 157 157 160 164 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 390
Write 225
Mixed 236
SusWrite 156
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 43.9
168% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 176
143% 202 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 87%
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GB
186GB free
Firmware: MAT2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 229 230 230 230 233 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 472
Mixed 369
SusWrite 245
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 57.4
199% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 336
261% 357 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 112%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
859GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 159 158 157 159 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 181
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 158
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
144% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 2133 2OZ Kingston KHX2133C11D3/8GX 0420 DDR3 2133 2OZ Kingston KHX2133C11D3/8GX 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $726
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback